| |
Disenfranchising the North through the National Identity Card scheme
by
Ibrahim Ado-Kurawa B. Sc (HONS) M. Sc Zoology (Applied Entomology)
[1]
Acting Director Research, Institute for Contemporary Research
(ICR) Kano
and General Editor Weekly Pyramid The Magazine
(ibrahimado@hotmail.com)
Kano, Nigeria
© 2001
PUBLISHED BY KUNGIYAR CIGABAN JAMA'AR AREWA
AREWA ENLIGHTENMENT SERIES NUMBER 1
Nigeria, the most populous country in Africa
with largest concentration of black people in the world is
undergoing a great political transformation triggered by a well
orchestrated campaign by a particular section of the country namely:
the press of Southwestern region, which is dominated by Yoruba
tribalists. After they have settled down as the new "masters of
Nigeria" their most important task now is to disenfranchise
their main rivals, the northerners, whom the Yoruba now regard as
their enemies, and refer to as "Hausa-Fulani" whenever it
suits them. The reason for this is may not be unconnected with the
fact that this "new enemies" of the Yoruba are the largest
in population with the most illustrious history being the successors
of pre-colonial tropical Africa's undoubtedly largest and most
prosperous state. They are also the only group that had an active
civil society in pre-colonial Nigeria when it was virtually
non-existent in other parts of Nigeria[2].
To comprehend how this situation has come to
pass it is necessary to explore briefly the history of the various
peoples residing in the area known today as Nigeria with particular
reference to geography as articulated by the Annaliste School[3].
This is because Chief Richard Akinjide one of the leading ideologues
of Yoruba supremacy recently claimed that in all of West Africa the
coastal areas have always been more populated than the hinterland!
And earlier a leading Yoruba tribalist writer who is patronized by
the western European literary and human rights groups arrogantly
claimed, "The anomaly is that the south is not only better
educated and more populous (although the 1991 census had this the
other way round)…"[4],
may be he conducted his own census that determined which region was
more populous. The minds of southerners have since been conditioned
into believing the false information that Southern Nigeria is more
populous than Northern Nigeria. The propagation of this falsehood
became more glaringly apparent with the weird and improbable figures
bandied about by the Yoruba dominated southern press.
Geographically speaking Nigeria encompasses a
wide range of flora and fauna from the Sahel and Savannah regions to
the North, to the high, cool plateaus of the Middle Belt to the
equatorial forest and mangrove swamps of the coastal regions.
Throughout West Africa, it is the Sahel and Sudan
Savannah areas, which have usually produced the great states
of the region. This Savannah region was essentially one of intense
competition where weaker tribes were pushed into the Forest
region whose ecology provided refuge to these weak peoples as
observed below by one of the leading geographers of Nigeria:
We are thus led to
conclude that in the early periods of West African history
the role of the forest areas has been that of a refugee
zone, providing, albeit temporarily, some degree of
security from the aggressiveness of stronger, better
organized groups in the grassland region to the north[5]. |
The stronger groups were to be found in the
Sudan Savannah while the Guinea Savannah is
located south of it just before the forest zone. The Guinea Savannah
was also a refugee zone for weaker tribes because of its
complex topography with protective hilltops. The Sudan
Savannah peoples of West Africa produced sub-Saharan Africa's
greatest achievements in statecraft. All the early states and great
empires of West Africa were located in this region for example
Ghana, Mali, Songhay and Borno. The Sokoto Caliphate, which
was the largest, most complex in organization and the most
prosperous state in pre-colonial tropical Africa was also in the
Sudan Savannah[6].
"The impetus toward large state building" later in the
forest region with the rise of the great Benin Kingdom and Alafinate
of Oyo "was probably brought from the north and east toward the
end of this thousand year blank period" of the stateless
history of the forest region[7].
In fact Philip Adler in his monumental World Civilizations:
Comprehensive Volume part 3; Equilibrium among polycentric
civilizations 500-1500 C.E. Chapter 19: Africa to the Fifteenth
Century, did not mention any forest state in West Africa, his key
identification terms in that chapter were: "Bantu, Berbers, Ghana,
Great Zimbabwe, Mali, Mansa Musa, savanna,
Swahili, Timbuktu"[8].
The arrival of the Europeans to the African
scene for slave trade initiated the process of an economic power
shift to the coast in the forest region but it was a slow process
that took centuries because in the pre-colonial times the Sokoto
Caliphate was as already noted the most prosperous state in
tropical Africa. The coastal areas provided the slave forts and one
of the most powerful forest Kingdoms the Alafinate of Oyo was
a great slaving polity trading in Muslim slaves and for that reason
it was obliterated by the Jihad movement of Shehu Usman Danfodio.
Humphrey Fisher has argued that one of the reasons of the jihad was
the enslavement of free Muslims by renagades. He documented beyond
reasonable doubt the objection of the jihad leaders to the
enslavement of free Muslims[9].
Missionary academics[10]
committed to the indictment of th Muslim leaders refused to consult
this paper, that of Meyers[11]
and the eyewitness account of Staudinger[12].
The Northern Region being the largest in size
and population contributed more poll tax revenue to the federation
account of Nigeria during colonial rule. The population of the North
was never in dispute then because it was directly linked to the size
of contribution to the government, rather than allocation from
government. For example in 1943:
Head XII of the Estimate of Revenue for that
year showed the following:
GENERAL TAX
Northern Provinces |
= |
500,000 |
pounds |
Eastern Provinces |
= |
122,000 |
" |
Western Provinces |
= |
125,000 |
" |
Colony |
= |
5,000 |
" |
LIVESTOCK TAX
Northern Provinces |
= |
120,000 |
pounds |
Eastern Provinces |
= |
2,000 |
" |
Western Provinces |
= |
50 |
" |
Colony |
= |
Nil[13] |
|
Despite its lion share to the Federal
Revenue, the North was a deprived region because such revenue was
used in developing the other regions by providing infrastructure to
facilitate exportation of raw materials. For example in the same
year the National government's expenditure on education was thus:
Northern Provinces |
= |
2341 |
pounds |
Eastern Provinces |
= |
47,000 |
" |
Western Provinces |
= |
34,000 |
" |
Colony |
= |
17,000 |
[14] |
Revenue from the Northern Provinces
contributed to the building of Lagos and the hydroelectric power
station at Kainji, the initial source of energy for the
industries of the South West. With the largest and most
heterogeneous population the North was more sophisticated
politically and it produced the first leaders of independent
Nigeria. The Muslim majority helped to produce the Prime Minister
of the Federation but the non-Muslim Northerners were not left out
in the Federal cabinet[15].
The tax figures shown above clearly
illustrate the bankruptcy of Akinjide's hypothesis. This is because
does it mean that in about fifty years the population of the north
has stopped growing and the south has overtaken it? This can never
be possible because unlike the average southerner most northerners
are polygamous. Consistently the north has remained more populous
since the pre-colonial period up to the present republic. But Yoruba
tribalists are committed to depopulating the north on paper there
are currently orienting the mindset of the public on the pages of
newspapers so that by the time they conduct the population census
and manipulate its results it will become acceptable. Northerners
must resist this paper genocide.
Lagos and other parts of Southern Nigeria
became favored by the new economic arrangement with ports located in
the south. Their cultural proximity to the Western World gave them
an advantage over the predominantly northern Muslims. The
Southerners accumulated capital over this period and after the civil
war came the oil boom. The Yoruba tribalists through the help of
their patriarch Chief Awolowo were better placed to reap the
maximum benefit. Northerners, "held the horn of the Nigerian
cow" and the Yoruba tribalists "milked the Nigerian
cow". The Yoruba tribalists and some of their Northern minority
allies succeeded in installing religious bigotry and intolerance.
With a firm control of the economy Yoruba tribalists charted their
project of snatching political power from the North having edged out
their only rivals in the South, the Ibos through deception. It must
not be forgotten that during the crisis leading to the Civil War,
Chief Obafemi Awolowo who was "a committed federalist"
gave signals that if the East goes its way the West will also
secede. "Indeed, Ojukwu, who led the Igbo secession, counted on
Western "solidarity" when he declared Biafra
independent"[16].
The Yoruba dominated print mass media
spearheaded the attack for snatching political power from the North.
The prominent manifestation of this attack became more obvious from
the 1980s onwards. Military misrule of which, many Yoruba political
actors from Awolowo to Babatope were principal participants,
provided the Yoruba with the seemingly legitimate basis for action
especially with the Western world's insistence on
"democratic" succession. The Yoruba dominated press
harassed the Northern political elite into conceding i.e. zoning the
presidency to the Southwest to allow a Yoruba who had a record of
fairness in public service to become president.
The Yoruba tribalists control the economy and
by the extension the press, just like the Jews in the
USA[17].
In addition they now control political power in Nigeria. Thus at the
moment they seem to appear as the most powerful black tribe or is it
"race" in the world. Power shift from the savannah peoples
of the North to one of the forest tribes is now complete, it
essentially began with the economic shift triggered by European
colonization and the creation of Nigeria, facilitated by the
policies of the governments they entrenched. The complexities and
ironies of history are such that a tribe of the forest region has
now assumed political power over others including those with older
political tradition, for the first time in about one thousand years
of statehood of the savannah peoples. Some of the Niger-Congo
tribes of Nigeria in fact never experienced statehood until the
arrival of the Europeans.
The Yoruba tribalists will struggle as much
as possible through conspiracies it must not be forgotten that they
had earlier deceived the Ibos. The current ID card fracas is one of
the hypocrital strategies of the Yoruba tribalists through which
they hope by disenfranchising majority of the Northerners. The
Yoruba tribalists have also cultivated the friendship of some
Northern minorities from the "Middle Belt" whenever
expedient. Thus we are now witnessing the germination of the seed of
Islam phobia sown by the missionaries, who capitalized
on the weakness of these Guinea Savannah peoples. The
liability of these two allies is their inability to absorb the
universality of the Christian ideology hence they have remained
imprisoned in their respective tribal shells.
The ID card project is the first strategy
that will be used by the Yoruba tribalists to ensure that the north
becomes depopulated on paper before the next census. Already, Lagos
State's "Chicago" Governor, Bola Tinubu has set the stage
for this claiming in January that Lagos now has 15 million people
when as at last count in 1991 its population was 5,725,116 while
Kano (excluding Jigawa) was 5,810,470[18],
therefore in ten years Lagos population has almost tripled and the
Northern population is stagnant? May be the "Chicago"
governor conducted population census recently.
The Yoruba tribalists are committed on they
desire to use the ID card for future elections. This is because with
their firm control of all organs of civic registration they hope to
manipulate the exercise so that the North will have fewer voters
thus permanently denying its peoples the chance of
"winning" any future presidential elections. The Minister
of State for Internal Affairs who is a stooge in the scheme of
things has asserted that there is no going back on using the card
for elections. According to him the aim of the card is to
distinguish Nigerians from aliens. But this is a farce because an
alien could easily go and register and get the card just as many
have got the Nigerian passport. The identity card can never succeed
because there is no standard residential addressing system in
Nigeria. The local government councils are constitutionally
responsible for this addressing system. They are the competent
authority that should identify their citizens, for the card to
succeed the local government councils must be the issuing agencies.
The Federal Government should only supply the materials and staff
that will carry out the clerical work as they have been doing in
other civic registrations such as births and deaths. This is if at
all the Yoruba supremacist dominated federal government is
interested in the success of the scheme and not in the elimination
of their rivals?
In most of the organized world identity cards
have never been election requirements. Only in countries manned by
dubious leaders such as Ivory Coast and Zambia. Alassane Outtara has
been denied contesting election in Ivory Coast because according to
the authorities his mother was not born in that country, never mind
the fact that he was born in that country and he has even served as
its prime minister. The reason is that if Outtara is allowed to
rule, political power will shift from the Southern Christians who
are the minority to Northern Muslims who are the majority. In
Zambia, Kenneth Kaunda the man who led the country to its
independence has been disenfranchised because his father was born in
another country, never mind the fact that Kaunda was the first
president of that country.
This is the level of irrationality in some
African countries and it is what the Yoruba tribalists want to
import into Nigeria. It may sound farfetched for the
"civilized" analyst of political events. But it is quite
credible when one considers that a key Yoruba minister in today's
federal government is so beclouded by his hatred of the Northern
"Hausa-Fulani" that he prescribed genocide for them in one
of his weekly newspaper columns. This is the irony of Nigerian
politics. Here is a man who called for genocide on the pages of
newspaper and he is rewarded with a powerful ministerial portfolio
even his Yoruba brother commented thus:
Reading of an African writer and politician
referring to a group somewhere as the Tutsis of some place insults
the gruesomeness and the horror of what happened in Rwanda in
1994[19].
This minister is also in full support of the
atrocities of OPC (Oodu'a Peoples Congress) the Yoruba
terrorist organization, the Chairman of his party, AD (Alliance for
Democracy) acknowledged that he once said "even though OPC is
an anarchist organization but that however they have a Yoruba
proverb that says "when you have a mad dog or a dog infested by
rabies, you don't remove all its teeth because one day you may want
him to BITE YOUR NIEGHBOUR" that is a minister of the
federal republic"[20].
The phenomenon of this genocide advocate
turned minister exposes the hypocrisy of Western patrons of Nigerian
politics who have consistently pretended to be supporting democracy
and peaceful co-existence of peoples and tribes all over the world.
They should not in anyway support a government that not only harbors
a genocide advocate but has gone to the extreme by making him one of
its pillars. This is because the same western governments sanctioned
Austria because of the presence of Nazi sympathizers in its
government. Or does it mean they support genocide anywhere except in
the West? The Austrian politicians are not as despicable as this
Nigerian minister who called for a Rwandan like scenario in which
75% of the Tutsis were wiped out[21].
If the Northern political leaders allow the
ID card election project for the short-term selfish interest as they
did in their senseless un-negotiated power shift[22]
then the Yoruba supremacists will win again and the North will
be obliterated politically. So, what is a little genocide on paper,
for ideologues of Yoruba supremacy in government? The ID card is a
much more benign form of genocide if it gets to pass, that is?
[1]
I am grateful to my Editor-in-chief Kabiru Mohammed who
read the draft and made corrections and also to Dr. Abdalla Uba
Adamu who connected me to the Internet.
[2]
International IDEA Democracy in Nigeria: Continuing
Dialogue(s) for Nation Building published in Sweden p. 121
[3]
According to Ferdinand Braudel, one of the leading historians of
this school, history corresponds to "three kinds of time:
geographical, social and individual" because at least in
part, history is determined "by forces external to man such
as geography and climate" this discipline seeks to
understand "an almost immobile history of man's relation
with the milieu surrounding him". For more
information see Gray, W. D. 1987 'BRAUDEL, Ferdinand' in Turner,
R. (ed) Thinkers of the Twentieth Century London pp.
103-105.
[4]
Maja-Pearce, A. 1999 'Army Arrangement' London Review of
Books 1 April
[5]
Mabogunje, A. 1976 'The Land and Peoples of West Africa' in
Ajayi, J. F. A. and Crowder, M. (eds) History of West Africa
vol. 1 Essex p. 5
[6]
Lubeck, P. M. 1986 Islam and Urban Labor in Northern Nigeria
p. 12 and Illiffe, J 1995 Africans the History of a Continent
p. 171
[7]
Gailey, H. 1970 History of Africa from the Earliest Times to
1800 New York p. 104
[8]
For more information see Adler, P. 1996. World Civilizations:
Comprehensive Volume. St. Paul Mn pp. 220-229 emphasis mine.
[9]
Fisher, H. J., 1985 'A Muslim William Wilberforce? The Fulani
jihad as anti-slavery crusade: an enquiry into historical
causes'. Islam in West Africa Seminar SOAS 5th March 1985.
[10]
Especially Kukah, M. H. 1993 Religion, Politics and Power in
Northern Nigeria Ibadan p. 2 where he cited his missionary
brother Trimingham. Another missionary Father Kenny of the
Dominican Order of Priests who was selective in his analysis.
See Kenny, J. 2000 The Spread of Islam through North to West
Africa 7th to 19th Centuries Lagos p.
217 note 79 where he cited Colvin, L. 1971 'The Commerce of
Hausaland, 1780-1833' in McCall, D. and Bennett (eds) Aspects
of West African Islam Boston, which is a paper on commerce
instead of the specific paper on slavery in the same book, (see
Meyers paper below) this is because Colvin indicted the Fulani
and Kenny being selective had to use it.
[11]
Meyers, A. 1971 'Slavery in the Hausa-Fulani Emirates' in
McCall, D. and Bennett (eds) Aspects of West African Islam
Boston.
[12]
Moody, J. 1990 In the Heart of the Hausa States Volume 2
Paul Staudinger translated by; Athens pp. 73- 74 where he
noted that pre-colonial Northern minority tribes used to sell
their kinsmen into slavery.
[13]
Abba, A. 2000 (ed) The Politics of Principles in Nigeria: The
Example of NEPU p. 5 Habib Raji Abdallah 'Lagos
is a Nigerian Town' West African Pilot Tuesday,
September, 28 1948 pp. 2-3
[15]
Danbazau, L.1993 Politics and Religion in Nigeria Kano
pp. 37
[16]
Osaghae, E. E. 1991. 'Ethnic Minorities and Federalism in
Nigeria' African Affairs 90: 247
[17]
The mass media in the USA is controlled by a powerful oligarchy
dominated by the Jews for more information see Brewda, J. et al
1994 Assault on the Presidency Leesburg p. 24.
[18]
Maja-Pearce, A. 1999 From Khaki to Agbada: A handbook for the
February, 1999 elections in Nigeria p. 123
[19]
Omotoso, K. 2000 'A Nigerian argument' The Guardian p. 49
[20]
Daily Trust Wednesday February 14, 2001 interview with
Ambassador Yusuf Mamman, emphasis mine.
[21]
Kupperman, A. J. 2000 'Rwanda in Retrospect' Foreign Affairs
Vol. 79 No. 1 January-February 2000 p.101.
[22]
See Ali Mazrui's interview in the Weekly Trust.
Brought to you by Kano Online 2001
|