Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Abu-Safwan

Pages: 1 2 3 [4]
46
Abu Safwan, i think you got the picture wrong, i dont have much time but insha Allah i will provide you with some things to think about regarding this, keep your mind broad.


before you will retort you have to read, with objectivity, the national contents of sex education. The real problem is that some of us always become duped by American conspiracy. 

47
You would be as well not to dewscribe such education as "western" or American. It is not universally approved there and no one will force it on Nigeria so if it is practised in Nigerian education it will be entirely at the choice of Nigeria.

There is also at lot of misunderstanding about much of it. It is not intended to teach young people to do sex. They don't usually need any education in this. It comes naturally.
It is meant to show them how to avoid STDs and unwanted pregnancies

The reason why I call it America or Western it is because it was initiated by UN abd this UN is controlled by American power. I have already show you it was nott even accepted by majority American citizens but it is still imposed and ditto for Nigeria. If there is anyn educational programme to teach children how to avoid STDS this is not the fair way to do it; my recommendation at alast part of the articl I think will suffice it. I think you have never read the contents.

48
General Board / THE ‘BLUE EDUCATION’ INTRODUCED TO NIGERIAN SCHOOLS
« on: October 21, 2009, 12:56:19 PM »
THE ‘BLUE EDUCATION’ INTRODUCED TO NIGERIAN SCHOOLS

Let us stand up against this evil curriculum of sex education which I may call it ‘Blue Education’. Yes of course! It is a Blue education and I will later show you some powerful evidence that may well shock you. Even though our government is not a religious one, the Nigerian citizens are deeply religious people as such that both Muslims and their Christian brothers are repelling this evil imposed system of Sex Education. Therefore, being the government is serving the interest of its citizens, and then it is the interest of Nigerian people not to ever accept this ‘Blue Education’ in Nigerian School curriculum. Hence, the government must protect this interest of the majority Nigerian citizens. But ironically, our government has accepted this evil educational policy. Then how far is true that democracy serve the interest of the majority citizens in the states? In any way they are telling lie because we have severally proclaimed that we don’t want sex education but they (government) accepted it and imposed it regardless of our need. What a nasty kind of education! What an evil imposed American policy! What a mad, uncultured and uncivilized government accepting this kind of ‘blue education’! Let us stand up against this evil policy of education in our nation. Let me remind us one very important point. In its attempt to destroy the moralities of religious world societies (especially Muslims), American government, on behest of its Jewish masters, has being producing the largest collection of the nastiest ‘Blue Films’ to provoke and corrupt the moralities of the religious societies towards illicit sex as it is prevalent in Western societies. The targeted religious societies are lucky as God continue to protect them from being affected by such nasty films due to their deeply religious moral injunctions. Thus, they were all saved from American conspiracy. Such morally religious resistance offends American conspiracy leaders who are aiming to destroy Muslim religious moralities; hence the need for an alternative in their evil approach. This time around, they came through education; that they literally imported ‘Blue Film’ contents into education curriculum, albeit in form of theory. To say it clearly, I mean that sexuality education is a theoretically translated ‘Blue Film’ contents incorporated into educational sector. Although the government pundits insist saying that the purpose of sexuality education is to improve sexual health through informing the students about STDs/HIVs transmission; this is only an appeasement and blandishment.
   I will now show you some powerful proofs that are self-evident and right-based; that the sex education curriculums are literally and theoretically translated contents of ‘Blue Film’.  The tacit objectives of the contents as provided in the National Sexuality Education Curriculum are: the male students will study the name and location of the most sensitive sexual parts in woman’s body and vice versa; children will exposed to learn the act of masturbation; and both male and female students will learn how to tease the sexual arousal of either sex partners (male and female) at variables. The nastiest contents as provided in page 54 states that junior secondary school boys and girls will be asked as a kind of occasional school debate to “brainstorm the popular view that boys with large penis are better lovers”. Foolish and highly animalistic! We have been already well informed from different sources that such were all parts of motion pictures ‘Blue Film’ contents. But the government pundits insist alleging that the purpose of sex education is to eradicate STDs and HIVs, and improve peoples’ sexual health. Enough is enough; we don’t need to have any new kind of sex education. The knowledge that our students are obtaining in ‘Reproductive System’ as in Biology is evidence-informed and rights-based as far as sex affairs is concerned. When one American crazy, Mark Richmond, a UNESCO’s global coordinator for HIV and AIDS, said: “In the absence of a vaccine for AIDS, education is the only vaccine we have,” I said in retort to his allegation that in the absence of a vaccine for AIDS, religious injunctions and laws governing social moralities are the only weapon we have. In short, in the absence of a vaccine for AIDS, ISLAM is the only weapon we have. In fact, in order to eradicate AIDS, illegal pregnancies and abortion all acts of illicit sex must be suppressed and laws must be enforced to deal with the culprits. As documented in American New York Times (dated Sept. 3, 2009), some of the UNESCO’s sex education contents guidelines “suggest, for example, that teachers begin discussing masturbation with children ages 5 to 8, with a more extensive discussion for those ages 9 to 12.
In opposition to such ‘blue educational contents Michelle Turner, founder of the Maryland-based Citizens for a Responsible Curriculum in America says: “I’m really concerned about what they want to teach 5- to 8-year-olds, and I have concerns about their position on abortion and the way they want to present it to youth,” she said. “Where are parents’ rights? It’s not up to the government to teach these things.” Colin Mason of the Population Research Institute, he said that “If you ever have a situation where kids need to be taught earlier than their adolescence, this is not the way to do it……It’s very graphic and encourages practices like masturbation, which conservative Christians and others feel are wrong.” These are opposition words from American non-muslim people. I wonder how those illogical Muslims try to desperately justify sex education for Muslim schools in its American contents! With these nasty contents, the world societies continue to repulse, with strong opposition, the imposed American policy of sexuality education. Strong opposition to sexuality education has been largely recorded in America itself. As Muslim believers who were commissioned by God to raise the moralities of humanity let us stand up against this evil system in our nation, Nigeria.
Finally, and important measures and logical steps to adopt in order to fight against proliferation of STDs/HIVs, illegal pregnancies, illicit sex and unsafe abortion are among others:
(a)  If it is for the purpose of eradicating STDs/HIVs and unsafe abortion then, it is necessary to start from fighting against illicit sex like adultery, sodomy and lesbianism. But, the irony is that these unreligious people are now making laws that allow people to practice all the aforementioned types of illicit sex. What an irrational thought;
(b) In order to fight the problems of STDs it is recommendable to enforce laws against illicit sex; hence the return to Islam has become necessary;
(c) If it is said that people need to be informed and educated about their sexual parts and other sex activities then it is recommendable for each and every ready-made partners for marriage to consult medical doctors and experts to obtain necessary knowledge to guide their marital sexual affairs at least, 2 or 3 months before their marriage;
 (d) And finally, all those who are not ready-made for marriage (especially students and small children) they should be informed about  the necessary religious precautions to abstain from approaching illicit and pre-marital sex activities; and such curriculum should be enforced into school religious subjects and can only be taught to students by religious scholars.  I am writing this piece of writing only for rightful people to benefit and protect their religion and moralities. I know the enemies, and those brothers infected by American-western virus will become distressed in their mind for pointing out this powerful truth. They are not against STDs; they are against our noblest religious moralities.   You should stand up with me against this evil system once again!
                                                   submitted by Salimullah


49
General Board / Re: WHY ONLY IRAN……. BUT WHY NOT ISRAEL?
« on: October 12, 2009, 05:12:45 PM »
What can we do, then?

Answer: nothing.

Muhsin, I greatly feel you; we can go on pray and supplicate our only God to grant us victory over those enemies.

50
General Board / Re: WHY ONLY IRAN……. BUT WHY NOT ISRAEL?
« on: October 12, 2009, 05:08:17 PM »
I agree exactly with your conclusions

Thanks Mr. Dave for your specification and acknowledgement.

51
General Board / Re: Sharing Hannatu's Dream
« on: October 06, 2009, 11:19:33 AM »
I wish to Learn Poem from Hannatu. So I want her to join the forum.

52
General Board / Re: WHY ONLY IRAN……. BUT WHY NOT ISRAEL?
« on: October 06, 2009, 11:12:00 AM »
Please Dave specify, exactly what? I could'nt understand.

53
General Board / WHY ONLY IRAN……. BUT WHY NOT ISRAEL?
« on: September 30, 2009, 10:25:07 AM »
"I wish to inform you once again, that I mai halin girma, have changed by display name into Abu-Safwan due to some problems. I shall now continue to use this new title. Therefore, the following article is for mai Halin girma or Abu-Safwan if you like".

WHY ONLY IRAN……. BUT WHY NOT ISRAEL?
It is because they are not Europeans…. Nor Americans: it is because they are Muslims and their state is ruled by Islamic government in form of Islamocracy (Shari’ah Ruling System). Any act of change that will lead a Muslim country to political, scientific and technological development the West (particularly the US) perceives it as a threat to their ‘Evilization’ that presently dominated the world social order. Why Iran most not afford nuclear technology when other nations have already afforded it?. UN security council members institutionalized that only their countries can afford nuclear weapon. This means that only America, China, France, England and Russia can afford nuclear bomb. But, other nations have the right to have nuclear technology only for peaceful purpose (e.g. energy power supply such as electricity), and not to produce a nuclear bomb. But today, despite of this law, over dozen of nations have afforded nuclear weapons: Israel, India, Germany, North Korea and Canada were among them. Most of these nations have afforded it illegally and were allowed to go unscathed and officially uninvestigated by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). For Israel and others alike, is illegal to obtain nuclear bomb as afar as nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty developed by IAEA is concerned, based on Article 6 of its charter. There must be a hypocrisy and injustice in the rule that only those nations (like the UN Security Council members) that have nuclear bomb could afford and retain it; while others have no right to even develop it. Disarmament policy must have been a double-faced strategy adopted by the UN Security Council. In 1970, Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) was put into effect. The principal law of NPT as reads in Encarta 2009, is thus: “Under the terms of the NPT, countries without nuclear weapons agreed not to develop them, and states possessing nuclear weapons agreed to work toward disarmament. The IAEA inspects the nuclear power and research facilities of participating non-nuclear weapons states to ensure that enriched uranium and plutonium byproducts are not being diverted to nuclear weapons production”. If the rule of disarmament was founded on justice and equity it will effect the law that not only the non-nuclear nations could not obtain it but also the nuclear ones must have destroy their own nuclear bombs. Going by this unjust disarmament policy, the remote impact will mean that Muslim countries would not be allowed to obtain it. If they are objective why is that Israel allowed to afford this nuclear bomb which is against the rules of NPT but Iran is being denied its right to afford its technology only for peaceful purpose. It is Israel that bombards the UN Security Council to must suppress Iran from its Uranium enrichment. Those nations that suppress others from obtaining nuclear bombs have already stored thousands of it in their weapons stockpile. Ironically enough, America which had been the only nation that used nuclear bomb in Hiroshima – Japan (on August 6, 1945) – is now the head of disarmament policy. What a ridiculous! All what I have been trying to educate our people is why only Iran is facing harsh pressure by the UN and  the world superpowers headed by America and controlled by the Jewish state of Israel? Let us examine this fact from just and fair analysis.
   Israel not wants to see that a Muslim nation in the Middle East has afforded a sophisticated military technology because it perceives that as a threat to its way of terrorism against the Palestinians in particular and the Middle East in general. This is the reason why it has destroyed the Iraqi nuclear reactor base in 1981 and Syrian nuclear installations in 2007. Israel is not an IAEA and who give it the right to attack the nuclear activities installation of other nations like Iraq and Syria. This is a patent act of terrorism but the UN never put forward any official inquiries on Israeli terrorist state because the world superpowers and UN Security Council are the slaves of the Jews. It should be noted that Israel is among the nations whom were banned from obtaining nuclear weapons; but it has been producing thousands of such bombs illegally. However, no official investigation and sanction has put forward by the IAEA and the UN Security Council being them serving the Jewish interest.  When India, Israel and other non-nuclear nations are developing nuclear technology they had never faced pressures of investigation by the IAEA or sanctions by the UN Security Council. But, Iran is now facing harsh pressure and incoming sanctions from UN Security Council motivated by Israel – the most illegal stockpile of WMD including nuclear bomb. Iran’s nuclear sites were thoroughly inspected by IAEA officials and were all confirmed for peaceful purpose and fulfilled the rules required for the legal nuclear activities. Iran has scores significant points in its ‘diplomatic debate’ with the world power in this case. It was able to present a new proposed bill on nuclear disarmament to IAEA and was approved well. According to IRIB as written by Ebrahimi: “the IAEA approved a resolution to ban attacks on nuclear installations as a necessity”. Thus, the Israeli ongoing plan to attack Iranian nuclear installation was eschewed. The approved bill also suggested that: the usurper state of Israel to stop its nuclear proliferation and abide by the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and as the first step bring their arsenals and nuclear installations under IAEA supervision. However, notwithstanding the international will, the representative of the Zionist regime at the agency announced unashamedly that it will not cooperate with the UN nuclear watchdog as per the ratified resolution”.
The controversy is not whether Iran is having nuclear bomb (the world knows that Iran hasn’t it at all) but whether it is having a programme that could use to make this bomb in the next 5-10 years. In all cases the IAEA’s report about Iranian nuclear activities is ‘peaceful and right’. But UN Security Council (presumably with the exception of China & Russia) appeared to rule out IAEA’s report and preparing to invade Iran. But, recently alternative decision suggests harsher economic sanctions against Iran over its nuclear programmes in preference to military invasion (New York Times September 28, 2009). The truth is that IAEA is no longer respectful in the eyes of the UN Security Council as are ready to ignore its decision about Iran. Ali Asghar, Iran’s envoy to IAEA has told press TV that: “IAEA Chief Mohammad al-Baradei says in paragraph 26, Iran has cooperated with the agency, improving the safeguard measures at the Fuel Enrichment Plant at Natanz”. Secretary of Iran's Supreme National Security Council, Dr. Saeed Jalili declares in retorting to West’s opposition saying: “Why do they express concern towards Iran's legal nuclear activities while they do not raise a smallest question on the nuclear arsenal of the Zionist entity? Who has given nuclear weapons to Israel?” Whether military invasion or economic sanction is to be set against Iran we should know the real motivator behind this evil is Israel. As documented in Telegraph UK Newspaper dated Sept 27, 2009, Benjamin Netanyahu spoke, via telephone, to Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, emphasizing that: “Action must be taken in all areas to increase pressure on Iran and impose crippling sanctions on it," he said, according to the Israeli newspaper, Haaretz ‘If not now, then when?”. Israeli foreign minister, Avigdor Lieberman made a call upon the UN that “the mad regime of Tehran” must be overthrown (Ibid). Chief of staff of the Israeli army, Gen. Gabi Ashkenazi has stated that Ahmadinejad had "to know that he can end his days like Saddam Hussein or Gaddafi" (ibid). Follow the link to read in full (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/iran/6237299/Israel-urges-West-to-stand-firm-against-Iran.html).
When Iran has publicly declared its peaceful nuclear activities and allowed IAEA for inspection, and signed treaty of nuclear non-proliferation and fulfilled the rules of Article 6 of IAEA charter, Israel has been allowed to do all this unchecked at its nuclear weapons factory at Dimona in the Negev, and without signing the Non-Proliferation Treaty. Despite of all these violation and non-cooperation by Israel it is Iran that is going to be punish or even attack in spite of its cooperation with international laws and IAEA’s rules and regulations. In fact, according to IAEA’s report, Iran has been much more cooperative and obedient to all IAEA’s laws governing nuclear activities for peaceful usage. But, Obama has made a big lie when he says: “Iran is breaking rules that all nations must follow”. According to IAEA’s investigation on Iran’s nuclear sites, Obama’s statement is a sheer and patent lie; it is Israel, India and North Korea, who are having hundreds or thousands of nuclear bombs, that break the rules that all nations must follow but the UN Security Council could not attack or even punish these belligerent nations because they are among the parties of non-Muslim nations whom they consider as single unbelievers community opposing the community of Muslim believers. But, Iran as a pure Muslim and Islamic nation that has been very cooperative with the rules of nuclear activities and never attempt to afford WMD in violation to IAEA’s rule was considered defiant and mad nation worthy of destruction under Israeli motives. It is now clear that any policy of disarmament or Nuclear non- proliferation is aimed to disarm only Muslim countries. The case of Pakistan (only Muslim state having nuclear bomb) is different; this possibility has come to it at an inevitable stage unable to suppress even by the world powers.

Why only Iran? It has no any kind of nuclear bomb. But why not Israel? It has many more stockpiles of nuclear bombs. The double standard is self-evident in Western International laws and policies. It is just as what David Duke mentioned: “America does not really oppose biological and chemical weapons or their use, all the Federal Government really cares about is which side uses them”. Why America is going to attack Iran for the same thing that other dozen of nations do. Suppose that Iran obtained nuclear bomb, then it is not that same Iran to be destroyed first but Israel.
Finally, let us stand up for Iran; its development is ours and will pave the way for further resurrection of Islamic political power and social order. When it comes to this issue religious sectarianism must have been irrelevant. We are all Muslims from the base. Let us reawaken our Sunni Muslim countries to follow the foot of Iran on political bases so as to escape from American imperialism and Western political hegemony as did Iran achieved. I can see that the moon of modern Islamic civilization glistering from Tehran horizon to South East Asia. Stand up with me for Iran once again for they are representing the general Ummah against the Western Kuffar. MAY GOD RESTORE OUR PAST GLORY AND PRESTIGE.

               Submitted by Salimullah
                               
               
       
   

54
Thanks mr. Dave for despising wicked behaviour of Israel. BUT the issue of Islamic fanatics causing damage to Islam is another problem from other angle and i am aware of it; I am now speaking from side of western, American and israeli damage to Islam. If you accept this truth, then you should make through research on Israeli international conspiracy you will confirm my article very objective and right.

55
oh Dave! 'a paraniod article with no evidence' who told so. have you trace the link provided at end of the article or have you ever read the Israeli newspaper HARETZ. Please don't say what you have no knowledge about. i do not mean to get you flip your lid (to make you angry), be patient with me.

56
General Board / Re: BABBAR NASARA: SIYASAR KANO A HANNUN MALAMAI
« on: September 28, 2009, 12:19:17 PM »
could you believe in the words of marx; if the world were to be ruled by true religion of God there will be a greater and faster prosperity.

57
EMTL thanks for your judiciousretort to Dave.

i want inform the general members of this forum that I mai halin girma, have changed my display name to Abu-Safwan due to the failure of password word problem; and all the previous attempt to retrieve it have failed. so thantk for cooperation. 

Pages: 1 2 3 [4]

Powered by EzPortal